Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > Hiring and Firing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:01 PM
SCA128 SCA128 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 30
Default Temps over laid off employees - Wisconsin

Quick question for the experts -

We've laid off quite a few production employees this year, all of whom have been called back within the past few weeks except for two. We are now in need of these two employees, but they weren't that strong to begin with and would rather go with temps instead. One employee was let go 6 months ago, I'm not so worried about hiring a temp over him. The other women was just laid off about a month ago. She has been with the company for five years and has had numerous disciplinary issues, but she knows how to play the system and has never been terminated. Nonetheless, we'd like to go a different direction, with a temp, rather than bring her back. We have sufficient documentation detailing her problems over the past few years, but I'm still nervous about bringing in a temp instead of her since she has only been laid off a month. What do you think?

Thank you in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:06 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

Unless there is a union contract or other agreement that confers "first recall" rights to ex-employees, I don't see any problem with selecting the workers that best fit your needs.
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:49 PM
SCA128 SCA128 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 30
Default

Ok, thank you.

No - no union affiliation and no agreements on any recall rights.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:52 PM
DAW DAW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,182
Default

While I agree with what was said, the disaffected employee can always claim different reasons for your decision, say Title VII reasons. I am not saying to not take the action, but I am saying that there is some advantage to documenting the actual business reasons for making the decision prior to making the decision. The same thing can be said for having two employees, one of whom gets promoted or termed, and the other does not. A "valid documented business reason for the decision" is not a perfect defense but it is a good starting point.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
Philip K. Dick (1928-1982)

If I do not answer a publicly posted question, it is because I do not know the answer. Sending me a PM does not change that. And California is the only state whose laws I am reasonably familiar with. Sending me a PM does not change that either.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DFWA Georgia crzywldcat4 HR Forum for Employers, Managers, & Human Resources 5 06-09-2007 12:12 PM
Can employer disclose employee's commissions to other employees? Wisconsin Wisconsin joed3054 HR Forum for Employers, Managers, & Human Resources 6 04-19-2007 09:58 AM
Exempt Employees - legalities of tracking time SoCal1 California Labor Laws 15 11-28-2005 08:34 AM
MARYLAND WAGE & HOUR FACT SHEET LABOR LAW POSTER laborlaw Maryland Labor Laws 0 05-25-2005 07:37 AM
Coping with Financially Dependent Parents, Hispanic Workers Worry about the Future, Y Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 04-07-2004 11:10 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming